1983 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (320 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (254 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 530 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (617 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 1983 Bentley Mulsanne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bentley Mulsanne | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Bentley | Chrysler |
Model | Mulsanne | 300 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 617 Nm | 332 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 15.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 24.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 72 L |