1983 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (328 HP) has 141 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Bentley Mulsanne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Bentley Mulsanne (610 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 1983 Bentley Mulsanne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Bentley Mulsanne 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Bentley Jeep
Model Mulsanne Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1983 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6750 cc 2987 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 328 HP 187 HP
Torque 610 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1958 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase Size 3070 mm 2916 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 106 L 80 L