1983 Bitter SC vs. 1965 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1983 Bitter SC is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Bitter SC. (178 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 430 kg more than 1983 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bitter SC | 1965 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Bitter | Cadillac |
Model | SC | DeVille |
Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3300 mm |