1983 BMW 316 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 BMW 316. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 BMW 316 (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 316 | 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 316 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1572 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |