1983 BMW 323 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 BMW 323. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 508 kg more than 1983 BMW 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW 323. (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW 323. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1983 BMW 323 has manual transmission. 1983 BMW 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 323 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | STS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2315 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 369 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |