1983 BMW 323 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 BMW 323. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 323.
Because 1983 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 BMW 323 (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Caliber. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1983 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Caliber.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 323 | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 323 | Caliber |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2315 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |