1983 BMW 525 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1983 BMW 525 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 BMW 525 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 525 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | BMW | Riley |
Model | 525 | RM A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2693 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |