1983 BMW 525 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1983 BMW 525 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1983 BMW 525. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 865 kg more than 1983 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 BMW 525 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 525 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2693 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |
