1983 BMW 525 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 525 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW 525. (241 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 525 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | 525 | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2693 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 100 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |