1983 BMW 725 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1983 BMW 725 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 BMW 725 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 BMW 725 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 BMW 725 (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 725 | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 725 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |