1983 BMW 725 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 725 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1983 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 725.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW 725. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 725 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 725 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |