1983 BMW 725 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1983 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 725.
Because 1983 BMW 725 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 BMW 725. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 BMW 725 (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 1983 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW 725 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 725 | Celica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |