1983 BMW M6 vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 BMW M6 (282 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 820 kg more than 1983 BMW M6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW M6. (334 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW M6 | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M6 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3453 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 334 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |