1983 BMW M6 vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 BMW M6 (282 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 450 kg more than 1983 BMW M6.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW M6. (334 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
1983 BMW M6 | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M6 | Safari |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3453 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 102 L |