1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1950 Buick 40
To start off, 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 110 kg more than 1950 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 1950 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Bristol | Buick |
| Model | Beaufighter | 40 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 4065 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3090 mm |
