1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Beaufighter | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3300 mm |
