1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 275 kg more than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Beaufighter | DeVille |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3300 mm |