1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 815 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Bristol | Renault |
Model | Beaufighter | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2770 mm |