1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 230 kg more than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2002 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Beaufighter | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2870 mm |
