1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
Model | Beaufighter | Continental |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 410 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |