1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 760 kg more than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
| Model | Beaufighter | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2890 mm |
