1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2011 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2011 Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Beaufighter | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1797 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2685 mm |
