1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2012 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 245 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Eos.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2012 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Bristol | Volkswagen |
Model | Beaufighter | Eos |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1444 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2578 mm |