1983 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 125 kg more than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Bristol Beaufighter | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | Beaufighter | XF |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2909 mm |