1983 Buick Electra vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1983 Buick Electra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1983 Buick Electra. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 185 kg more than 1983 Buick Electra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Electra | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Electra | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4129 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 40 L |
