1983 Buick LeSabre vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1983 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick LeSabre.
Because 1983 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick LeSabre | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Buick | Acura |
Model | LeSabre | TL |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2840 mm |