1983 Buick LeSabre vs. 2005 Citroen C5
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C5 (131 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1983 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 265 kg more than 2005 Citroen C5.
Because 1983 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Buick LeSabre (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1983 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick LeSabre | 2005 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | LeSabre | C5 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |