1983 Buick LeSabre vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1983 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick LeSabre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Buick LeSabre (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1983 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 1983 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick LeSabre | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | LeSabre | Commodore |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |