1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1964 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1983 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 190 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 1964 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | Skyhawk | Grand Break |
Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |