1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1966 NSU 1000
To start off, 1983 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (53 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 400 kg more than 1966 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 1966 NSU 1000 | |
Make | Buick | NSU |
Model | Skyhawk | 1000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1084 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |