1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 240 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1975 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | 240 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |