1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1983 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 230 kg more than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Buick | Skoda |
Model | Skyhawk | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |