1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 520 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Skyhawk | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Skyhawk | Sentia |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |
