1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Skyhawk | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
