1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,438 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 966 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | E |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2970 mm |