1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rover 75 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | Skyhawk | 75 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |