1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 660 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Buick | Jaguar |
| Model | Skyhawk | XJ |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3040 mm |
