1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 265 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Buick | Smart |
| Model | Skyhawk | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1820 mm |
