1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (263 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skyhawk | 3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |