1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 480 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Buick | Tata |
Model | Skyhawk | Nano |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |