1983 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (298 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 535 kg more than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Skyhawk | C |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1997 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |
