1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1962 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1962 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Brougham | 1962 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Brougham | Herald |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1146 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2320 mm |