1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1996 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 770 kg more than 1996 Toyota Celica.
Because 1983 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Brougham | 1996 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | Celica |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2470 mm |