1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1983 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Brougham | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Brougham | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2700 mm |