1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 648 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2760 mm |