1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2012 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2012 Ford Taurus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Taurus weights approximately 31 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2012 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Brougham | 2012 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1981 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2868 mm |
