1983 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 250 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Brougham | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2154 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2916 mm |