1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1952 Fiat 1400
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 20 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1952 Fiat 1400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Cimarron | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
