1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1955 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 310 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1955 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | Cimarron | A6G |
Year Released | 1983 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |