1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1956 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1956 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | Cimarron | P4 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |